🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers introduced a new game mode called Relaxed Breakthrough. In essence, this option mirrors the regular Breakthrough format but features a few key changes:

• Each team has just eight human participants, with the rest made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions performed by real players grant complete experience points, while bot actions provide lower rewards.
• Only two maps are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State map.
• Elements like Player tags, accolades, and career stat updates are disabled.

In short, the playlist delivers on its name: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume there's nothing wrong, since it gives more options for gamers seeking alternative ways to have fun with the game. But, if video games has shown one thing, it is that you can't please everyone. Which is to say, a lot of Battlefield 6 players are mad.

Community Responses: From Fury to Praise

"People want real players. Don't repeat the errors of your rivals," states one reply to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing idea," says another. Meanwhile, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player notes, "I have no idea where we are headed with this game," while someone else details everything they believe to be broken in the game: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We don't need this bot mode."

On the other hand, for every complaint, there are players sharing how much they're liking the new mode. "It's very fun to practice, real players prevent it from being a complete grind but it's very relaxed," reads one Reddit comment. "The community doesn't understand that there are players who have lives and don't play this title all the time. Let them find a middle ground," states another. One reply on Twitter explains that as they're "a parent gamer with limited time, this is great for me," and someone else applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Valid Criticisms and Community Input

All that said, players have valid points to complain about Casual Breakthrough. Some users have highlighted that it could increase queue times more extended for other modes due to the sheer number of options in the game already. Similarly, certain regions often face mostly bots in the current modes. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a required amount of real players, even though it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Finally, one of the biggest grievances is that a previous feature was meant to provide full XP, even against bots, but that got canned when they attempted to remove bot farms from the system. Thus Casual Breakthrough feels like the community meeting them halfway, according to forum feedback. A different user describes this addition as the devs "dropping the ball so hard, I experienced great enjoyment in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Be Made?

Should Battlefield Studios has proven anything so far with Battlefield 6, it's that they're paying attention and responding to player input. Tasks that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. Chances are that, should analytics indicates this recent mode isn't performing to their expectations, they will not hesitate to change it again.