🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during broader worries about industry interference with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, WHO officials raised concerns that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, delayed for at least twelve months after the law is enacted.

International experts specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the front of a pack “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover 65% of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch states the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We reside in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my property and gather the crop and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative said: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Further, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which allow for relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, they said, adding that underage people should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support developing rules to accomplish desired community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which involves increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.